-
via alexdc
We have two writers there, posting things as the day progresses. We’re also hoping to get some cool photos and footage to share with everyone.
So, if you’re into Design, come check us out.
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to say that, even though I could not attend, Nokia Conversations is covering the Open Studio event in London today (29apr).
We have two writers there, posting things as the day progresses. We’re also hoping to get some cool photos and footage to share with everyone. So, if you’re into Design, come check us out.
It’s been a long slog, but the site is now as tweaked as it can get, so we removed the password protection and we’re off on a new journey. As with any site, we’ll be adding and removing things as folks give us feedback. And I know you all will have plenty to say. I want to thank everyone involved and those who laid the ground work for me. Now I need to get dinner ready. Link: Nokia Conversations: Welcome to the conversation
UPDATE: Oh, I meant to say that 21apr is the traditional day observed for the founding of Rome. And while Rome wasn’t built in one day, it sure had to start somewhere, by Jupiter.
But, be careful where you _think_ you can get the money. I’ve never been a fan of ads as a mean to make money. At least not for someone who is just displaying the ads. The real money maker is the one who _sells_ the ads. But, for most services, it’s the best we got. Bollocks. I’ve never been satisfied with folks trying to build services that generate ‘eyeballs’ just to ‘monetize’ that traffic with ads. I’ve been even less enthused by social networking services that try to convert what is a personal interaction between the users of the service into a chance to score advertising views. Online social networking services thrive because they are a form of social lubrication. They are a means to an end, but not the end. We’re social grooming to _do_ things together – learn, invent, trade, strengthen trust. Then make money by promoting the activity, not by having folks mill about. Yes, social network is the concentrator, but what the folks end up doing is where the money’s at. One good example is O’Reilly. Is it a social networking service? Sure is. Where do they make money? Selling info to the network, the info the network trades in when within the O’Reilly social network. For O’Reilly, it is the social network that differentiates them from just another publisher. So, now I’m wondering about social networks overlaid on top of interest domains. Social networks, such as Facebook, which do not have a focus for the _why_ people come together, might never gain the proper traction to make money beyond a few anemic ad clicks, or, like Facebook, will have to contrive sleazy ways to get money off the social network. Someone like Facebook should optimize the service around the key reason folks use the service, rather than crate gimmicks to just keep folks around. MySpace is at least trying to capitalize on Music and LinkedIn on business services. And there are a ton of examples, I am sure. Just thinking out loud. These thoughts arose from noting that Google and Facebook are seemingly slowing down, and observing the interactions happening in my Twitstream. For some of you, I am sure this line of thinking is nothing new. Comments? |
|
|
Copyright © 2012 Molecularist - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|