Twitter SMS quotas

Got the following message from Twitter the other day:

“You have 10 incoming sms updates remaining this week. Try receiving unlimited updates at m.twitter.com. Also, thanks for using Twitter!”

Real bummer. But, from Twitter, it was coming to us all eventurally. SMSs cost money and, if you do the math, Twitter SMSs are not geared to be cheap – one message generates a ton of me$$age$. And, we all know that someone has to pay for it – either us or a sponsor.

Twitter did sneak in some tips into the SMSs a while back. Maybe they were practicing how to use their system to append messages to SMSs. Yeah, they were a bit annoying, and I wasn’t really able to see any context sensitivity (which would be ideal for providing interesting sponsored stuff). But, we all knew this had to come.

Chris O’Donnel commented on this previously (and some other folks have things to say, too).

But, now setting quotas, which I immediately used up, has been like taking my crack away. These past two days I have been franticly trying to work out my mobile methods for keeping up with my tweeps. Twitter via m.twitter.com is NOT the ideal way to follow Twitter. SMS is.

Alas, this cold-turkey method will certainly sharpen my thought processes that will lead to a decision to either accept sponsored Twits or for me to pay a monthly fee. Oh, yeah.

Do you feel the same?

As for the sponsored SMSs: I say ‘sponsored’ since I think click through ads will not really be the best way (though AdMobs might disagree). But, for Twtter, if they can get someone to pay for a chunk of impressions (a huge quota for users) then they are more likely to create ads that fit the twits. Though, if you do the math, the CPM needed might be too high.

What to do, what to do?

WidSets has undergone a big facelift and is no longer in beta

I was visiting WidSets, since I heard they had a Twitter wid.* I _had_ to go to the main site, since the mobile site kept sending me a noob packet and there was no way for me to sign in, only to register as a noob (tsk tsk).

Well, when I went to the main site, I saw the huge change. At the moment, there are some UI issues, such as the fancy mindmap-like browser (see below) is crashing and I can’t seem to reorder my wids (why I can’t re-order on the phone has been a gripe of mine since day 1).

I really haven’t explored the whole thing, but some things caught my eye:

– There’s a bit of levity. When the phone is connected to the service, there’s a thumbs up. And the search box has a dog to, yes, fetch stuff.

Picture 1-4

– There’s this interesting mindmap-like browser to explore all the widgets based on categories or tags or what.

Picture 2

– One interesting thing is that they now have a profile associated with your WidSets account. I’m not so sure where this is going. I suppose the profile adds a bit to the username when contributing WidSets, and contributors can’t be more than a small fraction of total users. Do they suppose to create a community (a tired word of mine) around WidSets? Once again, maybe around the contributors, but not _all_ the users. But, the tool is now there. Let’s see how it develops.

Picture 3

If you are WidSets user, you will have received a message regarding the update. If not, it’s still an interesting and useful service, especially if you don’t have a smartphone. For me, I always seem to reach for it when I have a simple, small, and contained problem to solve. Let’s see if it helps with Twitter.

Link: WidSets:

The new WidSets service has finally been launched and we have now come out of Beta.

*With the verbosity of my tweeps, I quickly over-ran my quota of incoming. But, the lovely N95 can’t do anything else if the browser is open, so m.twitter.com is not a long term solution for me. Argh.

links for 2007-11-10

links for 2007-11-09

Russ makes some great comments about that Nokia N95 and S60

Spot on, Russ.

Read this, folks.

Link: RussellBeattie.com – Some Nokia N95 and S60 Thoughts:

The thing which makes me crazy though, is this isn’t an *engineering* issue, it’s an organization issue. It’s a usability and design issue. It’s is not about how many resources you can throw at the problem, but how well the leaders of the company can make decisions and ensure those decisions are kept throughout the company. If you delegate decisions on the look and feel and form of your key devices, then they’ll get designed by commitee – or worse, by engineers – and then generally suck. This is what’s happened with the S60. The people who are in charge at Nokia need to demand a clean GUI and then make sure it’s accomplished.

<insert noun> Platform: Google makes one more serious step into the mobile world (and a few historical notes)

It’s about time.

I had a one-to-one with Andy Rubin two years ago. If you know Andy and his background (the Danger Hip-top), it was clear what Google wanted out of him. I picked up hints and indications in the years since, so I was past patience, waiting for these guys to finally get the ball rolling publicly.

We still talk about the Hip-Top as an amazing way to fuse internet-fueled services with a mobile device. The service is the spirit, the device is the body. Like re-incarnation, if you lose the device, you just need a new one and the spirit fills it up just like before. Now what if that spirit could live in other different devices? Alas, Danger didn’t have that luxury. But, I am sure Google will.

Heh, one more thing: A lot of this feels like when our team launched Series 60 (s60 to you noobs) back in 2001 – open platforms, cross-vendor, multiple devices, etc. Sounds similar, even to the similar sounding Open Handset Alliance. We created something called Open Mobile Alliance as a way to solidify the mobile standards at the time.

I wonder if it will go the same way, too – you can have all the partners in the world, but you still have to make the devices and deploy them in the market. Call s60 open to all, but to me, sadly, there is really only one vendor – ‘you know who’.

But as ‘you know who’ starts realizing that it’s a service company, maybe they will play well with Google, who is a service company slowly being a mobile company.

Way to go Google. Interesting times ahead for all of us.

Link: Google unveils cell phone software and alliance | CNET News.com:

Google officially unveiled Android, the new mobile phone software, during a press conference Monday morning. Thirty-four companies have said they will join the Open Handset Alliance, a multinational alliance that will work on developing applications on the Android platform. Members of the alliance include mobile handset makers HTC and Motorola, U.S. operator T-Mobile, and chipmaker Qualcomm.

A 200MHz ARM 9 processor is the minimum requirement for cell phones, said Andy Rubin, Google director of mobile platforms who co-founded the mobile software company called Android that Google acquired in 2005. The platform will be flexible, compatible with small or large screens, keyboards and other input methods, he said.

And more from TechCrunch:

Link: Breaking: Google Announces Android and Open Handset Alliance

Google just officially announced the Open Handset Alliance to create an open platform (to be called Android) for a Linux phone that can run mobile Google apps and others. The 34 partners include T-Mobile, Sprint Nextel, NTT Docomo, China Mobile, Telefonica, Telecom Italia, Motorola, Samsung, HTC, Qualcomm, Intel, and Google itself. No mention of Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, or Nokia (which is pushing its own Ovi development platform). Here is the press release.

Writes Andy Rubin, the man behind the Google Phone. :

Despite all of the very interesting speculation over the last few months, we’re not announcing a Gphone. However, we think what we are announcing — the Open Handset Alliance and Android — is more significant and ambitious than a single phone. In fact, through the joint efforts of the members of the Open Handset Alliance, we hope Android will be the foundation for many new phones and will create an entirely new mobile experience for users, with new applications and new capabilities we can’t imagine today

Android is the first truly open and comprehensive platform for mobile devices. It includes an operating system, user-interface and applications — all of the software to run a mobile phone, but without the proprietary obstacles that have hindered mobile innovation.

links for 2007-11-04

links for 2007-11-03