LeWeb3 program: C’mon guys, are we missing mobile again?

Try as I may to do otherwise, I come off sounding like a broken record:

By the end of next year there will be three billion people with mobile phones. When talking about the future of the Web, are we to ignore them?

Le Web is going to be an amazing conference (link to program, below). At first glance, I could whine that there is no mobile-related topics. But, it’s really not so bad, though it could be better. So, here’s a few thoughts on the program for this event:

  1. I am sure mobile will crop up (as it did all over last time). Maybe that’s enough? It’s nice that mobile thinking is starting to infuse everything, but it’s not enough.
  2. There are a few mobile-savvy folks speaking. Good start. There should be enough folks to hold up a discussion, should any come up
  3. dana boyd is under a youth and mobile and Web section. But, she’s alone for now. I think this would be a good area to expand the dialog on how mobile and Web collide. Even if it’s only under the area of younger users. That’s still good and relevant.

So maybe it’s not so bad (ufa! stop whining!). And, really, I should, at this time, offer
some folks to fit into dana’s segment – like fellow Nokia colleagues
Chris Heathcote, Matt Jones, Jan Chipchase, Younghee Jung; or David
Harper, from Winksite; or Jyri Engeström, from Aula; or, from MIT, Nathan Eagle or Leo Burd, and, of course, many of the amazing contributors to Carnival of the Mobilists. I’ll think of
others. You can too.

In any case, I’m going (just registered). And I will try not to be monotonous (promise!). Not everything is about mobile, duh. And mobile is not the only thing I care about, duh. Nonetheless, I intend to be an active contributor somehow – I hope my new mission at Nokia should count for something (hint hint, Loïc!).

Link: LE WEB 3: LeWeb3 program.

version 0.55
This program is subject to changes. Please keep sending me (blog@loiclemeur.com) ideas for great speakers, this is very helpful. Speakers with (*) are confirmed.

I do like that there is a segment on European competition. Last time, I was a bit explosive about the ‘tyranny’ of Silicon Valley. Heh heh.

Have you used mobidgets from mobease?

Well, I haven’t.

So, if you know the apps or the company, please let me know what you think of it. The mobidgets are not openly available and mobifindit won’t run on my phone.

Link [via Gary]: mobease.com � mobidgets.

mobidgets is a complete widgets engine for mobile phones (Symbian & MIPD) in the spirit of Yahoo! Widgets. With mobidgets, one can track the weather forecasts, stock quotes, news, Flickr photo streams or whatever else in a very efficient manner, right from the handset’s idle screen, thanks to these small applications named widgets.

Infoworld says: Expert say Web 2.0 doesn’t copy directly to phones

Eh, we knew this. So, does that make us all experts, or just really good at stating the obvious (at least, obvious to us)?

Heh heh.

Or is this just Infoworld’s way of slipping in Web 2.0 and mobile to double the dose of hepness?

Link: Experts: Web 2.0 doesn’t copy directly to phones | InfoWorld | News | 2006-10-18 | By Nancy Gohring, IDG News Service.

"Beware of naive copying of PC services," said David Wood, executive vice president of research for Symbian. "Some don’t translate." He was speaking Wednesday at the Symbian Smartphone Show in London.

Strategy Analytics says: Global handset sales to be near a billion this year.

Thems a lot of apples. It seems that soon we will be maxing out the world. Then what?

Link: Global Handset Sales Historical & Forecasts, 2002-2011.

Summary
Access this report

Global handset sales will grow 18% in 2006 to 986 million units. In 2007, emerging markets will be at the heart of 10% annual growth in global sales with volumes reaching 1086 million units. 2008 sales are projected to grow 6% to reach 1155 million units. Overall, global sales will grow at a 5.4% CAGR to reach 1286 million units sold in 2011.

Tired words: Beta

Oy, this one is starting to sound amateurish. Read on.

Beta – C’mon. Nowadays, who comes out with a polished product? Everything has a first version, some are just weaker than others. And I am having a hard time differentiating between beta and release – they all seem like a continuum, except lately we just get access earlier. I think what rubs me the wrong way is that it is used now for an excuse for a shoddy product (a bad beta is worse than a bad product) or for trying to catch some shine from the Web 2.0 folks who made a name for themselves last year.

You can review all my previous ‘Tired Words’ here on this page.