
Butterfly friend
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Sun 23.07.2006 16.45 Image169

Butterfly friend
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Sun 23.07.2006 16.45 Image169

Butterfly friend
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Sun 23.07.2006 16.45 Image168
This is a bit off-topic, but fits in well with some of the things I think about.
A while back I got all excited about coComment. To me, it was a way to track the conversations I contributed to.
Think about it, it’s really hard to track comments on posts that you have commented on. Only recently have I discovered that Flickr does this (don’t know since when), but it is a sure-fire way to rev up the interaction around a post or comment (sure has with me and Flickr).
I thought that coComment was going to be that glue that would allow me to track other comments made on posts I left comments on.
Nope. It was only tracking comments made by other coCommenters. Pretty lame, as, really, what are the chances or utility in that? It was a clear ‘let’s build a new community and ditch existing communities’ thought.
I stopped using it and kept looking for that comment glue.
Well, lo! I wasn’t the only one looking for the glue – coComment’s number 1 feature request was just that: help me track comments from others made on posts that I have commented on. See the link below for some more comments. Or go here, to read it on the coComment site.
Yipee!
But it gets better: you can track a conversation around a post without even leaving a comment. Cool. And better, yet: you can track an invisible conversation around a page that doesn’t take comments – they call it ‘meta-comments’ (reminds me of a Web page sticky-note service I once heard about).
Ok, so the upshot:
Posts are like micro-silos of conversations. The current way it is done, your comment, in your mind, is the last, unless you go back and read the post again later. Oh, sure you could track the comments via a feed, if the site has one.
We’re supposed to be having a conversation. How can we be having a conversation if folks are doing drive-by commenting, never having an easy way to follow up on any responses to what they said or any further commentary on what they were interested in?
CoComment is a right step in that direction. It let’s me keep an eye on the conversations I am interested in, either where I commented, or where I didn’t, or where there is a separate layer of commentary*.
That will keep the conversation flowing.
Link: BusinessBlogWire: coComment Now Tracks All Blog Comments.
The main coComment improvements are:
– The ability to track ALL comments left at a page, regardless of whether the commenters are coComment users. Killer feature.
– The ability to track comments at a page without making a comment yourself. Killer feature.
– The ability to converse with other coCommenters at any Web page that does not allow commenting.
*One idle thought: CoComment lets you leave invisible comments on pages, meta-comments. If those comments were restricted to a small group of people, then you would have something like a gossip area overlaid on the online world. Kinda reminds me of the IRC back-channels. Such meta-comments could be like permanent back-channel noise of conversation online. And only members of a certain ‘select’ group would ever find that meta-commentary, that invisible graffiti. Interesting to see if such behaviour evolves.

Hanging out on Basholm near Porvoo
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Sun 23.07.2006 13.51 Image166

Kitchen witches and bunny rabbits at the Keramiikkapaja Anubis, Iittala Finland
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Rainy day activities.
In the last few months I’ve picked up a GPS module, a Suunto t6 wrist computer (yes, it can tell time), a heart rate monitor (with the t6), and an accellerometer (also for the t6). It’s been part of some personal research into real-time, near-real-time, and post-event sensors-based analysis. It really arose out of my (obsession) to log physical parameters associated with each of my runs, such as route, temp, clothing, and my emotional and physical state.
After using these various types of sensors, augmented with personal observations and Internet data, I’ve come to realize that sensors are as much about the Mobile Lifestyle as mobile phones are.
Matt Jones (link below) had a brainwave recently about mobile sensors, set off by reading, via Kotke, an article by Kevin Kelly (yes, from the Long Now Foundation, whose seminars I keep telling everyone to listen to).
I wish Matt luck with his Tricorder.
And, prompted by this cognection, I would like to impart some observations I have had from hooking up to sensors:
– The format of the real-time display of info (like my t6) is important. Maybe the phone is not the only display, but could be the main computer with some satellite display(s).
– Not all info in needed real-time. Some info is more appropriately reviewed when not in real-time.
– Also, there are different time-scales for different parameters, such as weather (long-time) and locations (short-time).
– Finally, some sensors are more intrusive or complicated than others, such as GPS (complicated), heart-rate (semi-intrusive), accellerometer (invisible).
Regarding the sensors, themselves, I’m not sure all these sensors could be ‘in’ the phone, but definitely all of them could be networked ‘with’ a phone. The sensors will likely be peppered around the body, clothing, devices, tools, domains, environment (hmm, sounding ubiquitous) – the thing being sensed will determine how that data is served.
Have fun Matt.
Link: Blackbeltjones/Work: � Here 2.0: Big Here, Little Screen.
What I immediately imagined was the extension of this quiz into the fabric of the near-future mobile and it’s sensors – location (GPS, CellID), orientation (accelerometers or other tilt sensors), light (camera), heat (Nokia 5140’s have thermometers…), signal strength, local interactions with other devices (Bluetooth, uPnP, NFC/RFID) and of course, a connection to the net.
The near-future mobile could become a ‘tricorder’ for the Big Here – a daemon that challenges or channels your actions in accordance and harmony to the systems immediately around you and the ripples they raise at larger scales.
I’m kinda getting tired of all the muni-WiFi talk.
First of all, folks talk about it as the data-manna from heaven. Nah, it’s only another access method. If done right, it could unleash a whole new level of creativity and products. But, it’s still not going to be a walk in the park for users – it’s still going to be a tad complex.
Second, muni-WiFi will not kill mobile phones. So, enough about crying about loss of market from either side of the argument. Operators, make value instead of stonewalling. WiFi geeks, you’re still going to need a mobile phone, whether it has a WiFi or WCDMA antenna.
Third, muni-WiFi is not new. Does anyone remember Ricochet? I think there was another one called Metro-something or other. That was almost 10 years ago.
Fourth and last, I do agree though that muni-WiFi today has a better chance than the previous umpteen attempts. This time around, there is better connectivity from the base station, more devices in customer hands, and a greater demand. I am not sure, though, if this is the cycle of build-out that will actually take root.
Eh, back to my regularly scheduled program.

Magic FIFA cereal
Originally uploaded by schickr.
I got it for the nifty-factor – the cereal changes into a football when milk is poured on it. It really did, and was really nifty. But, ugh, it was so sweet, my kids wouldn’t eat it.
Well, nothing stopped my wife and I from pigging out on it. Burp!

Magic FIFA cereal
Originally uploaded by schickr.
I got it for the nifty-factor – the cereal changes into a football when milk is poured on it. It really did, and was really nifty. But, ugh, it was so sweet, my kids wouldn’t eat it.
Well, nothing stopped my wife and I from pigging out on it. Burp!

Play with me
Originally uploaded by schickr.
Jippo and Punkin are an interesting couple. Jippo always wants to play. Punkin wants nothing to do with the pooch. She can hold her own against the dog, but not when the dog is having some tasty food.
In any case, we stress the cat’s dominance, otherwise she’d be poochie snack.