links for 2008-03-24

links for 2008-03-21

ReadWriteWeb on: 35 Ways to Stream Your Life

Josh Cantone, on Read Write Web has a run-down of a bunch of different ways to lifestream (link below). I don’t know about you, but I think that’s significant.

He also points to an earlier article (primer) by Rich McManus. It was reading some stuff by RIch about lifestyle aggregators that initially got me thinking of this and was a driving thought behind the stuff I did here at Nokia.

The great thing is that there is a large collection of ways folks are doing lifestreaming. With each one, we end up learning more about what works and doesn’t, increasing the chance of a big breakthrough (in the next 6 months?).

One other thing that Josh points out, is Jeremy Keith is one of the early explorers in this space. Interesting. I’d forgotten that.

Link: 35 Ways to Stream Your Life – ReadWriteWeb

It’s a pretty good bet that if you’re not making a Twitter or Facebook application, you’re probably making a lifestreaming application.

Great essay by Kevin Kelly on Human Identity

Kevin Kelly has written a great essay on the current challenges to human identity, challenges from tech, society, and new knowledge.

I think this ties a lot into some previous comments I made related to emergence and the like.

Link: Kevin Kelly — The Technium:

A major theme of this present century will be the pursuit of our collective identity. We are on a search for who we are. What does it mean to be a human? Can there be more than one kind of human? In fact, what exactly is a human?

I posted the following comment:

A while back I had a thought about how things go from simple to complex, hopping to the next layer of complexity and then complexifying once more (the basic emergence thinking). It’s similar to SBJohnson’s Long Zoom and comments from Alex Wright on information architecture.

One thing that struck me was some sort of subservience to the network above – best exemplified by ants, who seemingly have subsumed their lives to the network at the hive-organism level.

Logically, I concluded that humans (who are clearly a network of individual cells who have subsumed their existence to the human-organism) must at some level subsume their existence to the network above them – society.

Sure we do that, sort of. But I get a feeling that current society is like the volvox to multi-cellular creatures. Or isn’t it?

And consequently, what _is_ the network next up that societies must be subsumed under?

But, in all this, I see what gives us humans the anxiety of identity is that we think we _must_ be individuals with free will. But as the network above us gets more complex (indeed mobile phones and the intarwebs are part of this) we refuse to turn ourselves into subsumed parts of a greater network. We try to have a global view or control of that network a layer up.

In summary, our identity was simply a construct as we solidified the strength of the organismal network. Now as we become ‘cells’ in the next network up, that network will force us to subsume our global views as we become parts in a network.

One more thing: Arthur C Clarke’s ‘Childhood’s End’ sort of is a story of humans stepping up into the next level and subsuming their identity.

links for 2008-03-15