-
"This editorial calling for action from world leaders on climate change is published today by 56 newspapers around the world in 20 languages"
The need for Plain English DIYbio Safety Guidelines
When we were setting up the wetspace over at The Sprouts, there was a lot of discussion about safety. We were all interested in safety, but Mac was clearly stressing that the future of DIYBio depends heavily on showing that DIYBio can be done safely.
At the set up we had three people, Kay (an active DIYBiologist), Manuel, and Charles, who have (recent) academic and corporate lab experience, and me with academic experience (if a bit hazy from years of inactivity). Together we (mostly them) were able to go over what was needed to make the wetspace safe for reagents, working, disposal, and so forth (especially for The Sprouts).
Highlighting these concerns, the iGEM competition was closed to non-main stream scientists, partly due to safety issues. And the DIYBio-NYC folks are inundated with media request, to see what they are up to, particularly to allay any community safety fears.
I've been doing some investigation and I can't really find a central place for "Plain English" Safety Guidelines that are relevant to DIYBiologists. I envision a wiki where links and info are collated and annotated, training videos, lists of where to get or how to make safety enclosures and equipment, links to downloadable material safety data sheets, lists of suppliers and agencies and safety companies (such as disposal), and so on. But the key thing is that it would be easily accessible and tailored for the DIYBiologist.
This is one aspect of ensuring safety among DIYBiologists, but there are a few more and I am still figuring out how to offer them.
I am not sure _where_ this wiki should be. A quick look at Open Wet ware shows that all the safety info is lab-specific or hidden behind firewalls (understandable, since it's about institutional rules and such).
So, my questions are:
1) Is this a good idea? (I know it is)
2) Where should this wiki be?
3) Who wants to be part of it? (I don't think it should be an open wiki, but curated by a few people. And, of course, since I mentioned it, I should be part of it.)
links for 2009-12-02
-
"At one point, Eva Tanguay not only might have knocked Eminem off the charts, she might have simply knocked him out. Jody Rosen’s fabulous piece in Slate alleges that “from 1904 until the early 1920s, Eva Tanguay was the biggest rock star in the United States.”"
-
"Sasha Frere-Jones unpacks Susan Boyle's hit record, emphasis mine: "One reason that Boyle’s success might not have much to do with popular music is that, compared with television, popular music isn’t that popular.""
-
Brilliant.
links for 2009-12-01
-
"We are putting together a workshop called FutureLabCamp in Boston in early 2010. The focus is building the future of science laboratories with open source hardware and software, low-cost and DIY instruments, cloud computing, and the internet of things. We’re bringing together hardware hackers, HCI wizards, standards builders, and forward-thinking researchers together for an amazingly productive weekend."
Increasing tinkerability – explaining DIYbio
I was with my father this Thanksgiving and he asked me about "that Biology thing" I've been getting involved in. He's known for some time that I've been increasingly focused on science in the past few years and that, with my move back to the Boston area, I've been meeting up with scientists and biohackers.
I explained to him what Synthetic Biology and DIYbiology were all about. I showed him my video of my last DIYbio activity, who were the characters involved, what the impact has been so far.
Being a biz guy, he kept asking me what was the "end goal," to help him wrap his head around what would motivate folks to tinker with Biology. He wanted to know if there was a scientific goal or if there were products folks wanted to build.
After a long circular discussion, he finally realized that the field was so nascent that, really, the goal was to "increase the tinkerability" of Biology.
Of course, that conclusion is filtered through my view of where these areas are at. Right now, engineers and non-institutional biologists are mostly focused on simplifying and domesticating Biology. Issues like science and products will arise naturally as the accessibility and malleability of biological systems increases.
What do you think? Do you think that's an appropriate assessment?
Image from Matt Biddulph
links for 2009-11-30
-
Neat little map, but took me two seconds to find 3 defunct companies in the Boston area.
links for 2009-11-27
-
"The Center for PostNatural History is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge relating to the complex interplay between culture, nature and biotechnology. The PostNatural refers to living organisms that have been altered through processes such as selective breeding or genetic engineering. The mission of the Center for PostNatural History is to acquire, interpret and provide access to a collection of living, preserved and documented organisms of postnatural origin."
Video: DIYBio meetup 22nov09
We had a DIYbio Cambridge Boston Sommerville meetup this past weekend to get familiar with a nice new hackspace, The Sprouts, to come up with a project for the next few months, and to move and set up equipment in the current space.
The great folks at The Sprouts actually want a wet-space for DIYbiology. They gave us some space and they even had some equipment. We added to that the equipment Mac picked up from a failed biotech.
The whole moving, setting-up thing was quick. We had Kay, Mac, Manuel, Paul, Charles, Jason, and I there, so the "many hands" made the work lighter.
I was happy to see things happening, space being set up, projects being set. Of the things on my to-do list, a few have been now knocked off, allowing me to join existing set-ups.
I took some video of what we were up to.
One last thing: I am so pleased with The Sprouts. They only opened in August, but show great promise. I hope that our group can be part of their growth and give back as even more than they have already so generously given us.
links for 2009-11-23
-
"“The level of ingenuity in the Third World to reuse things is so great. We send things that a lab here would say, it’s not worth the expense to fix it. But people in the Third World have this kind of MacGyver mentality where somehow or other you make it run again.’’"
links for 2009-11-21
-
"Hey DIYbio-Boston peeps. I’ve been making progress on getting us a lab space here in the Boston area."
So full of awesomeness.