Some comments by Cringlely on communication network operators

File this one under ‘Interesting thoughts from interesting people’.

In Bob Cringley’s columns in the past few months, he has been discussing issues around Net Neutrality. In the column linked below, he talks to Bob Frankston (creator of VisiCalc) about some ways Microsoft could use the Internet to fix the mess we’re in and fix he Bell-head mentality of our communications networks.

It’s a good read, as always. I particularly like Frankston’s comment below.

Link: PBS | I, Cringely . June 29, 2006 – If we build it they will come.

"Another [example of the collateral damage in the way out communications networks have been built] is that we have redundant capital-intensive bit paths whose only purpose is to contain bits within billing paths," Frankston explains.

Indeed, this a direct description of what many folks think is the power of telephone networks, wireless or wired. And this is the mentality that is creeping back into the Internet in the whole Net Neutrality discussion.

Then, Frankston restates a common disruptive idea – just bypass the damned gatekeepers and build your own network.

Concentrate less on womb-to-tomb and more on end-to-end by embracing
the idea of community-owned networks. One billion dollars each in seed
capital from Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo, and Google would be enough to set
neighborhood network dominos falling in communities throughout America
with no tax money ever required. And they’d get their money back, both
directly and indirectly, many times over.

Hmm, what could GYM do with all their cash? If only they could play together kindly.

I think such a GYM-owned network is as much a pie-in-the-sky as re-educating network operators the Net Neutrality and being a bit pipe and such is good for business.

Are you as cynical as I am?

 

Mobile Opportunity on: Why are mobile application sales dropping?

Ok. So this might be old and beaten (see all the amazing discussion), but I just got back from holidays and I had to put it here.

This is part of trend of reports I’ve been seeing around. I remember one about Java games, too.

What to do, what to do? I guess education is a good start. Yo, Phil!

And to throw the firecracker in the flames:
Does it matter? Are these apps showing up in other ways, in other places? In the PC world, Apple and MS keep nibbling away at ISVs by adding the same functions into the OS. And do people actually want add-on software in the first place? How many PC users buy software after their first purchase? Also, let’s face it, the bulk of phone buyers are not computer folks but people who want a phone and then some. Smartphone, schmartphone – it’s all the same to them.

Link: Mobile Opportunity: Why are mobile application sales dropping?.

"Don’t bother doing a survey. Everyone knows it’s true." And sure enough, if you poke around on the web, you can find a lot of commentary raising questions about the viability of the mobile data market.

Notes from an interview with Jack Scully, comments on Steve Jobs, product creation, and Apple’s 30th anniversary

As part of a series of interviews of Apple notables for the 30th anniversary of Apple, Jack Scully, the CEO who took over from Jobs, made some great comments about Jobs’ way of building products.

He mentioned that Jobs had some strong first principles in creating a product:
– Start with the user experience
– Tune the hardware to the software
– Have unparralleled industrial design
– Market a tech product as a fashion statement
– Look at the complete system and building the ecosystems around it (as Apple did with desktop publishing and the iPod)
– Clarify and simplify complex business models
– Attract outstanding people

Scully continues to say that there were of course some personal attributes that allowed Jobs to pull off the things he did. For example, Jobs constantly sees things in a simpler way, he makes no compromises, he is willing to think differently how business can be built.

Another interesting comment by Scully, that I try to distill here is that Jobs is at his best when focused on right brain – creativity, art, music, etc. Jobs once called the Mac ‘a bicycle for the mind.’

Interesting perspective here.

My take on the narrative of our mobile lives

The story I wrote for receiver is now out – ‘One Night’. The other authors were: Rudy de Waele, Mark Curtis, Lee Humphreys, Tim Cole, Karenza Moore, Frank Lantz, and Antony Bruno.

Let me know what you think.

Oh, and they read one of my works. Go listen.*

Link receiver magazine number 16:

This receiver issue wants to spark off some ideas about social networking the mobile way: clubbing, seeing your favourite band, sharing memories of a night out or playfully exploring the city, getting to know and experiencing, even creating, music – can mobile add to all these? And how does it affect how we get our friends together for joint action? Does it trigger emergent behaviour? Or is it the ideal means to pull it all together? What do *you* think?

Oh, and I guess I need to be intelligent over the next few days as people come visit my site after reading the story.

*The recording is well done, especially since I gave no direction. The guy reading did a great job, though more of a BBC feel. In my mind, it was in that pressed, urgent, beatnik style (think baret, black turtleneck, smoky bar, and on stage). 🙂

Hidden in plain sight: Invisible grafitti, subversive tagging, and sub-cultures

In my submission to receiver (coming later this week, I hope), I mentioned how RFID and barcode scanners on phones could allow for an invisible world, right under parents’ noses. It’s not original, as I recall hearing of games and such, where there are 2D barcode tags peppered around an area with game codes and such (indeed, another article in receiver mentions it as well). And there is Semapedia, which is hoping to tag the world with 2D barcodes that lead to relevant Wikipedia articles.

But, here’s my thought (and it could tie into all the stuff Dave and gang are doing at Winksite): Subversives can go to a Website that has a kit for them to create barcodes or order RFID tags with which they can hide any sort of info in plain sight.

Yeah, sites like that are available, but I have found them all to be a bit techy.

What I have in mind would actually be designed with the subversive in mind, helping them and teaching them how to use tags (or whatever sort) to leave tags all over. Also, the kit would help them make whatever links to other things, such as websites or content, that would be attached to the tag (heck, it could be just plain text without any online or SMS connection). Basically, it would have all they need to do their slinking about.

OK, so Semapedia and Winksite are on paths parallel to what I am thinking. Maybe I am just looking for a more overt subversive outlook. 🙂

Really, the whole subversive thing ties into what I think folks in alternative circles could hack for their own, in a sort of closed way.

Just a brainwave for the day.

Eh. Kinda quiet lately.

My silence here is not reflective of my mind or self – I’m deep into the last weeks of my holidays, enjoying an amazing summer in Finland, and this week, Hungary.

As usual, I have a long list of things to write about – interesting services,  insights, and, hopefully, something new.

A few things I can tell you now (posting from my phone keeps things mercifully short):
– I was invited to write for Vodafone’s August edition of receiver magazine (along with Rudy deW and Mark C, among others). I’ll give you the link when it goes live.
– My book has sort of stalled, as I realize I need  this holiday break to re-focus my thoughts and spirit.
– I’ve done some deep thinking about mobile Web services (don’t I always?) and have noticed myself looking even farther forward. I think this last wave of the Web is already making inroads into the mobile world. But now my mind’s on the next wave – for the mobile and fixed domains.
– And, finally, some interesting stats from IN, jun06, the Inside Innovation insert from Business Week:*

– 3.2 M Blackberries
– 50 M PDAs
– 70 M iPods
– 190 M Gameboys
– 820 M PCs
– 1.5 B TV sets
– 2 B Mobile phones [cs: and growing faster than all the others, I’m sure]

In the  mean time, if you have something cool to share, please leave a comment.

*I was not impressed by the insert. Indeed, ‘innovation’ is getting to be a tired concept and word for me. There’s too much adulation of folks who make clever stuff and so much saccharine advice. Blech. Real innovators just do it, not sit around and pontificate.